Using the W3C’s online markup validator (http://validator.w3.org) I evaluated the inaccessible homepage document to see whether or not it was poorly coded. From the results I established that there were 64 errors found. Typical issues were found, for example the incorrect html structure might look like this:
Therefore to make it accessible, I corrected the html markups by using simple codes for example:
When correcting the HTML structure in my accessibility document, it has come to my consideration that it took longer to code the web page than I thought it would be. Although the codes were very simple, I was more familiar coding the incorrect way. The correct HTML markups made a huge difference to the overall website. As the correct html coding, there is only a limited of choices to changing the font size which gives it the downfall i.e.
Whereas the incorrect html coding you are able to change the font size i.e.
But the advantage of the standard markup would be is that the HTML document is easier to read.
